Review
. 2020 Jun 13;S1878-8750(20)31301-2.
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.043.
Online ahead of print.
Affiliations
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA USA.
- 2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
- 3 Neurosurgical Unit, Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advance Diagnostics(BiND), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Item in Clipboard
Review
Parthik D Patel et al.
World Neurosurg.
.
. 2020 Jun 13;S1878-8750(20)31301-2.
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.043.
Online ahead of print.
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA USA.
- 2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
- 3 Neurosurgical Unit, Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advance Diagnostics(BiND), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Item in Clipboard
Abstract
Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) has continued to evolve over the past few decades, with significant advancements in technology and technical skills. From endonasal cervical approaches to extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusions, MISS has showcased its utility across all practice areas of the spine, with unique points of access to avoid pertinent neurovascular structures. The field of adult spine deformity has also recognized the importance of minimally invasive techniques in its ability to limit complications, while providing adequate sagittal alignment correction and improvements in patients’ functional status. Although MISS has continued to make significant progress clinically, consideration must also be given to its economic impact and the learning curve surgeons experience in adding these procedures to their armamentarium. This review aims to examine current innovations in the field of MISS, as well as the economic impact and future directions of the field.
Keywords:
cervical spine; lumbar spine; minimally invasive; thoracic spine; value.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Less invasive spinal deformity surgery: the impact of the learning curve at tertiary spine care centers.
Wang MY, Tran S, Brusko GD, Eastlack R, Park P, Nunley PD, Kanter AS, Uribe JS, Anand N, Okonkwo DO, Than KD, Shaffrey CI, Lafage V, Mundis GM, Mummaneni PV; MIS-ISSG Group.
Wang MY, et al.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Aug 23:1-8. doi: 10.3171/2019.6.SPINE19531. Online ahead of print.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019.PMID: 31443084
-
The Evolution of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery.
Momin AA, Steinmetz MP.
Momin AA, et al.
World Neurosurg. 2020 May 17:S1878-8750(20)31042-1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.071. Online ahead of print.
World Neurosurg. 2020.PMID: 32434014
-
The effectiveness of selective thoracic fusion for treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review protocol.
Eardley-Harris N, Munn Z, Cundy PJ, Gieroba TJ.
Eardley-Harris N, et al.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):4-16. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2338.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015.PMID: 26657460
-
Neuronavigation in minimally invasive spine surgery.
Moses ZB, Mayer RR, Strickland BA, Kretzer RM, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, Baaj AA.
Moses ZB, et al.
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Aug;35(2):E12. doi: 10.3171/2013.5.FOCUS13150.
Neurosurg Focus. 2013.PMID: 23905950
Review.
-
Paradigm changes in spine surgery: evolution of minimally invasive techniques.
Smith ZA, Fessler RG.
Smith ZA, et al.
Nat Rev Neurol. 2012 Aug;8(8):443-50. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.110. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
Nat Rev Neurol. 2012.PMID: 22710631
Review.
Citation text