doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.622099.
eCollection 2021.
Affiliations
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States.
- 2 Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Acute and Critical Care Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.
- 3 Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
- 4 Center for Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Houston Methodist Academic Institute, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, United States.
- 5 Reproductive Biology and Gynaecological Oncology Group, Swansea University Medical School, Singleton Park, Swansea, United Kingdom.
- 6 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States.
- 7 Center for Biomimetic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, United States.
- 8 Sutter Gold Medical Foundation, Stockton, CA, United States.
- 9 IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Rome, Italy.
- 10 3R Biotech, Milan, Italy.
- 11 Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, United States.
Item in Clipboard
Jeffrey L Van Eps et al.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol.
.
Display options
Format
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.622099.
eCollection 2021.
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States.
- 2 Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Acute and Critical Care Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.
- 3 Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
- 4 Center for Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Houston Methodist Academic Institute, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, United States.
- 5 Reproductive Biology and Gynaecological Oncology Group, Swansea University Medical School, Singleton Park, Swansea, United Kingdom.
- 6 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States.
- 7 Center for Biomimetic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, United States.
- 8 Sutter Gold Medical Foundation, Stockton, CA, United States.
- 9 IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Rome, Italy.
- 10 3R Biotech, Milan, Italy.
- 11 Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, United States.
Item in Clipboard
Display options
Format
Abstract
Remodeling of the human bony skeleton is constantly occurring with up to 10% annual bone volume turnover from osteoclastic and osteoblastic activity. A shift toward resorption can result in osteoporosis and pathologic fractures, while a shift toward deposition is required after traumatic, or surgical injury. Spinal fusion represents one such state, requiring a substantial regenerative response to immobilize adjacent vertebrae through bony union. Autologous bone grafts were used extensively prior to the advent of advanced therapeutics incorporating exogenous growth factors and biomaterials. Besides cost constraints, these applications have demonstrated patient safety concerns. This study evaluated the regenerative ability of a nanostructured, magnesium-doped, hydroxyapatite/type I collagen scaffold (MHA/Coll) augmented by autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in an orthotopic model of posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion. After bilateral decortication, rabbits received either the scaffold alone (Group 1) or scaffold with PRP (Group 2) to the anatomic right side. Bone regeneration and fusion success compared to internal control were assessed by DynaCT with 3-D reconstruction at 2, 4, and 6 weeks postoperatively followed by comparative osteogenic gene expression and representative histopathology. Both groups formed significantly more new bone volume than control, and Group 2 subjects produced significantly more trabecular and cortical bone than Group 1 subjects. Successful fusion was seen in one Group 1 animal (12.5%) and 6/8 Group 2 animals (75%). This enhanced effect by autologous PRP treatment appears to occur via astounding upregulation of key osteogenic genes. Both groups demonstrated significant gene upregulation compared to vertebral bone controls for all genes. Group 1 averaged 2.21-fold upregulation of RUNX2 gene, 3.20-fold upregulation of SPARC gene, and 3.67-fold upregulation of SPP1 gene. Depending on anatomical subgroup (cranial, mid, caudal scaffold portions), Group 2 had significantly higher average expression of all genes than both control and Group 1-RUNX2 (8.23-19.74 fold), SPARC (18.67-55.44 fold), and SPP1 (46.09-90.65 fold). Our data collectively demonstrate the osteoinductive nature of a nanostructured MHA/Coll scaffold, a beneficial effect of augmentation with autologous PRP, and an ability to achieve clinical fusion when applied together in an orthotopic model. This has implications both for future study and biomedical innovation of bone-forming therapeutics.
Keywords:
biomaterials; biomimicry; bone regeneration; nanomaterials; platelet-rich plasma; scaffold; spinal fusion; tissue engineering.
Copyright © 2021 Van Eps, Fernandez-Moure, Cabrera, Taraballi, Paradiso, Minardi, Wang, Aghdasi, Tasciotti and Weiner.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Positive effect on spinal fusion by the combination of platelet-rich plasma and collagen-mineral scaffold using lumbar posterolateral fusion model in rats.
Liao JC.
Liao JC.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Feb 6;14(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1076-2.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019.PMID: 30728046
Free PMC article. -
Histological Evaluation of Hydroxyapatite Granules with and without Platelet-Rich Plasma versus an Autologous Bone Graft: Comparative study of biomaterials used for spinal fusion in a New Zealand white rabbit model.
Zakaria Z, Seman CN, Buyong Z, Sharifudin MA, Zulkifly AH, Khalid KA.
Zakaria Z, et al.
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2016 Nov;16(4):e422-e429. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2016.16.04.004. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2016.PMID: 28003887
Free PMC article. -
Use of a collagen-hydroxyapatite matrix in spinal fusion. A rabbit model.
Tay BK, Le AX, Heilman M, Lotz J, Bradford DS.
Tay BK, et al.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Nov 1;23(21):2276-81. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199811010-00005.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998.PMID: 9820906
-
Biomimetic hydroxyapatite/collagen composite drives bone niche recapitulation in a rabbit orthotopic model.
Minardi S, Taraballi F, Cabrera FJ, Van Eps J, Wang X, Gazze SA, Fernandez-Mourev JS, Tampieri A, Francis L, Weiner BK, Tasciotti E.
Minardi S, et al.
Mater Today Bio. 2019 Apr 20;2:100005. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2019.100005. eCollection 2019 Mar.
Mater Today Bio. 2019.PMID: 32159142
Free PMC article. -
The impact of platelet-rich plasma on postoperative outcomes after spinal fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yolcu YU, Wahood W, Eissa AT, Alvi MA, Freedman BA, Elder BD, Bydon M.
Yolcu YU, et al.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2020 May 22:1-8. doi: 10.3171/2020.3.SPINE2046. Online ahead of print.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2020.PMID: 32442977
Review.
References
-
-
Alberio L., Safa O., Clemetson K. J., Esmon C. T., Dale G. L. (2000). Surface Expression and Functional Characterization of α-granule Factor V in Human Platelets: Effects of Ionophore A23187, Thrombin, Collagen, and Convulxin. Blood 95, 1694–1702. 10.1182/blood.v95.5.1694.005k24_1694_1702
–
DOI
–
PubMed
-