Long-Term Pain Characteristics and Management Following Minimally Invasive Spinal Decompression and Open Laminectomy and Fusion for Spinal Stenosis

. 2021 Oct 18;57(10):1125.


doi: 10.3390/medicina57101125.

Affiliations

Free PMC article

Item in Clipboard

Gilad J Regev et al.


Medicina (Kaunas).


.

Free PMC article

Abstract

Background and Objectives: To compare the long-term pain characteristics and its chronic management following minimally invasive spinal (MIS) decompression and open laminectomy with fusion for lumbar stenosis. Materials and Methods: The study cohort included patients with a minimum 5-year postoperative follow-up after undergoing either MIS decompression or laminectomy with fusion for spinal claudication. The primary outcome of interest was chronic back and leg pain intensity. Secondary outcome measures included pain frequency during the day, chronic use of non-opioid analgesics, narcotic medications, medical cannabinoids, and continuous interventional pain treatments. Results: A total of 95 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis underwent one- or two-level surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis between April 2009 and July 2013. Of these, 50 patients underwent MIS decompression and 45 patients underwent open laminectomy with instrumented fusion. In the fusion group, a higher percentage of patients experienced moderate-to-severe back pain with 48% compared to 21.8% of patients in the MIS decompression group (p < 0.01). In contrast, we found no significant difference in the reported leg pain in both groups. In the fusion group, 20% of the patients described their back and leg pain as persistent throughout the day compared to only 2.2% in the MIS decompression group (p < 0.05). A trend toward higher chronic dependence on analgesic medication and repetitive pain clinic treatments was found in the fusion group. Conclusions: MIS decompression for the treatment of degenerative spinal stenosis resulted in decreased long-term back pain and similar leg pain outcomes compared to open laminectomy and instrumented fusion surgery.


Keywords:

clinical outcomes; fusion; laminectomy; minimally invasive; spinal decompression.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures


Figure 1



Figure 1

Distribution of the reported Verbal Descriptor Scales (VDS) for back pain for the MIS decompression and fusion groups.


Figure 2



Figure 2

Distribution of the reported Verbal Descriptor Scales (VDS) for leg pain for the MIS decompression and fusion groups.


Figure 3



Figure 3

Distribution of back and leg pain frequency for the MIS and fusion groups.


Figure 4



Figure 4

Pain frequency among the MIS and fusion groups.


Figure 5



Figure 5

Chronic pain treatments among the MIS and fusion groups.

References

    1. Disease G.B.D., Injury I., Prevalence C. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1789–1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7.



      DOI



      PMC



      PubMed

    1. Deyo R.A., Mirza S.K., Martin B.I., Kreuter W., Goodman D.C., Jarvik J.G. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA. 2010;303:1259–1265. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.338.



      DOI



      PMC



      PubMed

    1. Rajaee S.S., Bae H.W., Kanim L.E., Delamarter R.B. Spinal fusion in the United States: Analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine. 2012;37:67–76. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820cccfb.



      DOI



      PubMed

    1. Herkowitz H.N. Lumbar spinal stenosis: Indications for arthrodesis and spinal instrumentation. Instr. Course Lect. 1994;43:425–433.



      PubMed

    1. Lad S.P., Babu R., Ugiliweneza B., Patil C.G., Boakye M. Surgery for spinal stenosis: Long-term reoperation rates, health care cost, and impact of instrumentation. Spine. 2014;39:978–987. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000314.



      DOI



      PubMed

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on vk
VK
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Close Menu