Bone Marrow Aspirate in Spine Surgery: Case Series and Review of the Literature

. 2021 Dec 9;13(12):e20309.


doi: 10.7759/cureus.20309.


eCollection 2021 Dec.

Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Thomas Noh et al.


Cureus.


.

Abstract

Background With the modernization of biotechnology, there has been a concerted effort to create novel biomaterials to promote arthrodesis for spine surgery. The novel use of the stem cells from bone marrow aspirate (BMA) to augment spine surgery is a burgeoning field because these cells are considered to be both osteoinductive and osteogenic. We sought to review the evidence behind the use of BMAs in spinal fusions and report the results of our own case series. Methods PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for studies that investigated the use of stem cells for spine surgery. For our own case series, the medical records of 150 consecutive patients who underwent a lumbar spinal fusion with BMA were retrospectively reviewed for adverse events (AEs) for up to two years after surgery. Results In our case series, there were no AEs identified in 49% of our patients. Of the identified AEs, 61% were unrelated to the use of BMA (e.g., UTI and heart failure), with the remaining 39% likely unrelated to its use (e.g., back pain and anemia). There was a 92.8% arthrodesis rate with the use of BMA. Conclusions We reviewed the rationale, basic science, and clinical science for BMA usage in spine surgery and concluded that BMA is safe for use in spine surgery and is associated with a high rate of arthrodesis.


Keywords:

arthrodesis; bone marrow aspirate; case series; literature review; mesenchymal stem cells; spine surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Complications related to osteobiologics use in spine surgery: a systematic review. Mroz TE, Wang JC, Hashimoto R, Norvell DC. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:86–104.



      PubMed

    1. Prospective study of iliac crest bone graft harvest site pain and morbidity. Kim DH, Rhim R, Li L, et al. Spine J. 2009;9:886–892.



      PubMed

    1. Short-term adverse events, length of stay, and readmission after iliac crest bone graft for spinal fusion. Gruskay JA, Basques BA, Bohl DD, Webb ML, Grauer JN. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:1718–1724.



      PubMed

    1. Autograft versus allograft for cervical spinal fusion: a systematic review. Tuchman A, Brodke DS, Youssef JA, et al. Global Spine J. 2017;7:59–70.



      PMC



      PubMed

    1. Adverse reaction and events related to musculoskeletal allografts: reviewed by the World Health Organisation Project NOTIFY. Hisenkamp M, Muyelle L, Eastlund T, Fehily D, Noel L, Strong DM. Int Orthop. 2012;36:633–641.



      PMC



      PubMed

Grant support

IRB was funded by ISTO Technologies Inc.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on vk
VK
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Close Menu