Laterally Placed Expandable Interbody Spacers With and Without Adjustable Lordosis Improve Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study

. 2021 Dec 9;13(12):e20302.


doi: 10.7759/cureus.20302.


eCollection 2021 Dec.

Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Yan M Li et al.


Cureus.


.

Abstract

Introduction Interbody spacers are necessary for achieving disc height restoration when surgical intervention is used for the treatment of severe degenerative disc disease. Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (MIS LLIF) is a popular surgical approach that historically uses large static interbody spacers through a lateral approach. However, static spacers have been associated with iatrogenic distraction and excessive impaction forces, which may increase the risk of subsidence and loss of lordosis, compromising stability. Expandable interbody spacers with or without adjustable lordosis may help address these concerns by maximizing segmental lordosis and aiding in sagittal balance correction. This study describes the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients treated with expandable interbody spacers with or without adjustable lordosis, for MIS LLIF. Materials and methods This is retrospective, single-surgeon Institutional Review Board-exempt chart review was of 103 consecutive patients who had undergone MIS LLIF at one to two contiguous level(s) utilizing expandable interbody spacers with or without adjustable lordosis (66/103 patients had adjustable lordosis spacers). Collection of clinical and radiographic functional outcomes occurred at preoperative and postoperative time points through 24 months. Results One-hundred and three consecutive patients were evaluated-average age, 58.2 ± 12.1 years; 42.1% (45/107) were female. There were 78.6% (81/103) one-level cases and 21.4% (22/103) two-level cases for a total of 125 levels; 44.8% (56/125) were performed at L4-5 and 34.4% (43/125) at L3-4. The average estimated blood loss was 24.6 ± 12.3cc. Mean operative time was 61.0 ± 19.1 min, and mean fluoroscopic time was 28.2 ± 14.6 sec. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back and leg pain scores decreased significantly by an average of 7.1 ± 1.0 points at 24 months (p<0.001). Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores significantly decreased by a mean of 67.4 ± 8.9 points at 24 months (p<0.001). Lumbar lordosis significantly improved by a mean of 3.1 ± 8.8° at 24 months (p=0.001). Anterior, middle, and posterior disc height significantly increased at 24 months by averages of 4.7 ± 3.1, 4.0 ± 3.0, and 2.1 ± 2.2mm, respectively (p<0.001). Neuroforaminal height had significantly increased at 24 months by a mean of 3.0 ± 3.6mm (p<0.001). Segmental lordosis significantly improved by 3.7 ± 2.9° at 24 months (p<0.001). There were 51 patients with abnormal preoperative Pelvic Incidence-Lumbar Lordosis (PI-LL) measurements that significantly improved by 9.1 ± 4.9° (p<0.001) and 52 patients with normal preoperative PI-LL measurements that improved by 0.2 ± 4.6° (p=0.748) at 24 months. One-hundred percent fusion occurred at all levels, and no findings of radiolucency were observed. One case of subsidence (1/125, 0.8%) was reported at 24 months. No implanted-related complications were reported, with 0% pseudoarthrosis and no secondary surgery required at the operative levels. Conclusion Indirect decompression and sagittal correction were achieved and maintained through a 24-month follow-up. Functional clinical outcomes significantly improved based on decreased VAS pain and ODI scores at 24 months. This study resulted in positive clinical and radiographic outcomes for patients who underwent MIS LLIF with expandable interbody spacers with or without adjustable lordosis.


Keywords:

adjustable lordosis; degenerative disc disease; expandable interbody spacers; mis llif; sagittal correction.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared financial relationships, which are detailed in the next section.

Figures


Figure 1



Figure 1. Expandable interbody spacer with adjustable lordosis (RISE®-AL, Globus Medical, Inc., Audubon, Pennsylvania, USA) in expanded and minimized forms


Figure 2



Figure 2. Expandable interbody spacer (RISE®-L, Globus Medical, Inc., Audubon, Pennsylvania, USA)


Figure 3



Figure 3. Implant graft chamber

Additional autogenous bone graft may be packed into the graft chamber of the implant after expansion and around the implant if desired.


Figure 4



Figure 4. Standing lateral lumbar spine radiograph with superimposed lines displaying the measurements evaluated in this study

Measurements included disc heights, neuroforaminal height, segmental lordosis, and lumbar lordosis


Figure 5



Figure 5. Mean VAS back pain

The results show a significant decrease in VAS back pain scores from baseline and sustained at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. VALAL/L- are the mean VAS scores for AL and L patients combined (103 patients); VASAL-AL patients only (66 patients); VASL-L patients only (37 patients) VAS: Visual Analog Scale; AL: expandable interbody spacer with adjustable lordosis; L: expandable interbody spacer without adjustable lordosis


Figure 6



Figure 6. Mean ODI scores

The results show a significant decrease in ODI back scores from baseline and sustained at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. ODI.AL/L- mean scores for AL and L patients combined (103), ODI.AL- AL patients only (66), and ODI.L- L patients only (37) ODI: Oswestry Disability Index; AL: expandable interbody spacer with adjustable lordosis; L: expandable interbody spacer without adjustable lordosis


Figure 7



Figure 7. Average anterior, middle, posterior disc heights and neuroforaminal heights

Significant improvement from baseline (preop) values were achieved at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and sustained at 24-month follow-up. ADH: anterior disc height; MDH: middle disc height; PDH: posterior disc heights; NFH: neuroforaminal height

References

    1. Etiology for degenerative disc disease. Hemanta D, Jiang XX, Feng ZZ, Chen ZX, Cao YW. Chin Med Sci J. 2016;31:185–191.



      PubMed

    1. Arthrodesis by the distraction-compression method using a stainless steel implant. Bagby GW. Orthopedics. 1988;11:931–934.



      PubMed

    1. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:2024–2029.



      PubMed

    1. Long-term follow-up study of posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Nakai S, Yoshizawa H, Kobayashi S. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10451044/ J Spinal Disord. 1999;12:293–299.



      PubMed

    1. The lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar and thoracic spine: a review. Arnold PM, Anderson KK, McGuire RA Jr. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:0–215.



      PMC



      PubMed

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on vk
VK
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Close Menu