Subsidence of a partially porous titanium lumbar cage produced by electron beam melting technology

. 2022 Oct 8.


doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35176.


Online ahead of print.

Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Fabio Distefano et al.


J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater.


.

Abstract

The lumbar intervertebral devices are widely used in the surgical treatment of lumbar diseases. The subsidence represents a serious clinical issue during the healing process, mainly when the interfaces between the implant and the vertebral bodies are not well designed. The aim of this study is the evaluation of subsidence risk for two different devices. The devices have the same shape, but one of them includes a filling micro lattice structure. The effect of the micro lattice structure on the subsidence behavior of the implant was evaluated by means of both experimental tests and finite element analyses. Compressive tests were carried out by using blocks made of grade 15 polyurethane, which simulate the vertebral bone. Non-linear, quasi-static finite element analyses were performed to simulate experimental and physiologic conditions. The experimental tests and the FE analyses showed that the subsidence risk is higher for the device without micro lattice structure, due to the smaller contact surface. Moreover, an overload in the central zone of the contact surface was detected in the same device and it could cause the implant failure. Thus, the micro lattice structure allows a homogenous pressure distribution at the implant-bone interface.


Keywords:

TiAl-based alloy; electron beam melting; finite element analysis; lumbar Interbody fusion; porous structures.

References

REFERENCES

    1. Zhang Z, Li H, Fogel GR, Xiang D, Liao Z, Liu W. Finite element model predicts the biomechanical performance of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with various porous additive manufactured cages. Comput Biol Med. 2018;95:167-174. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.02.016

    1. Punt IM, Visser VM, Van Rhijn LW, et al. Complications and reoperations of the SB Charité lumbar disc prosthesis: experience in 75 patients. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:36-43. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0506-8

    1. Rundell SA, Isaza JE, Kurtz SM. Biomechanical evaluation of a spherical lumbar interbody device at varying levels of subsidence. SAS Journal. 2011;5:16-25. doi:10.1016/j.esas.2010.12.001

    1. Dvorak MF, Kwon BK, Fisher CG, Eiserloh III HL 3rd, Boyd M, Wing PC. Effectiveness of titanium mesh cylindrical cages in anterior column reconstruction after thoracic and lumbar vertebral body resection. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:902-908. doi:10.1097/00007632-200305010-00012

    1. Stieber JR, Donald GD. Early failure of lumbar disc replacement: case report and review of the literature. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19:55-60. doi:10.1097/01.bsd.0000163414.53732.a3

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on vk
VK
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Close Menu