An alternative method to evaluate lumbar interbody fusion status focusing on position change of screw-rod constructs


Objectives:

The evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion status is generally subjective and may differ among raters. The authors examined whether the assessment of position change of screw-rod constructs could be an alternative method for the evaluation of fusion status.


Methods:

Sixty-three patients undergoing lumbar interbody single-level fusion were retrospectively reviewed. Three-dimensional images of screw-rod constructs were created from baseline CT examination on the day after surgery and follow-up CT examinations (3-5 months, 6-11 months, and ≥ 12 months) and superposed, with position change of screw-rod constructs being evaluated by the distance between the 3-dimensional images at baseline and follow-up. The evaluation was repeated twice to confirm the reproducibility. Fusion status on follow-up CT examinations was assessed by three raters, where inter-rater reliability was evaluated with Fleiss’ kappa. The results of the fusion status were classified into fusion and incomplete fusion groups in each timing of follow-up CT examinations, where the amount of position change was compared between the two groups.


Results:

The evaluation of position change was completely reproducible. The Fleiss’ kappa (agreements) was 0.481 (69.4%). The medians of the amount of position change in fusion and incomplete fusion groups were 0.134 mm and 0.158 mm at 3-5 months (p = 0.21), 0.160 mm and 0.190 mm at 6-11 months (p = 0.02), and 0.156 mm and 0.314 mm at ≥ 12 months (p = 0.004).


Conclusions:

The assessment of position change of screw-rod constructs at 6 months or more after surgery can be an alternative method for evaluating lumbar interbody fusion status.


Key points:

• Lumbar interbody fusion status (satisfactory, incomplete, or failed) is associated with the quantification of position change of screw-rod in this study. • Reference values for the evaluation of position change in identifying interbody fusion status are provided. • Position change of screw-rod could be a supportive method for evaluating interbody fusion status.


Keywords:

Computer-assisted; Image processing; Spinal fusion; Surgical Instruments.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on vk
VK
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Close Menu