The serpentine pattern on MRI as an early prognostic factor after fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis

. 2022 Nov 25;101(47):e31573.


doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031573.

Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

In-Suk Bae et al.


Medicine (Baltimore).


.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the relationship between the serpentine pattern nerve roots (SNR) and prognosis after lumbar fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) by comparing clinical outcomes in patients with or without a serpentine pattern. LSS patients with neurological symptoms often present with SNRs. Several studies have shown that LLS symptoms are worse in patients with SNRs. However, the relationship between SNR and outcome after spinal fusion surgery has not yet been established. A total of 332 patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, were enrolled. Patients were divided into those with a serpentine pattern (S group) and those without a serpentine pattern (N group). The prognosis of the 2 groups was compared using visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index, claudication distance, medication dose for leg dysesthesia, and glucose tolerance. A total of 113 patients had a serpentine pattern, while the remaining 219 did not. Symptom duration and presence of diabetes mellitus were significantly different between the 2 groups (N = 25.4, S = 32.6, P < .05). Changes in the VAS score for lower extremity pain between the 2 groups at 1 year after surgery showed that patients without a serpentine pattern had significantly better outcomes than those with a serpentine pattern (N: 2.7 ± 1.1 vs S: 4.1 ± 1.3; P < .001), despite the score change at 1 month showing no difference (N: 3.5 ± 0.9 vs S: 3.8 ± 1.0; P = .09). SNRs on MRI are more prevalent in diabetic patients and are a negative prognostic factor in lumbar fusion surgery for LSS. Our insights may help physicians decide the optimal surgical plan and predict the postoperative prognosis of patients with LSS.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

    1. Verbiest H. Pathomorphologic aspects of developmental lumbar stenosis. Orthop Clin North Am. 1975;6:177–96.

    1. Schatzker J, Pennal GF. Spinal stenosis, a cause of cauda equina compression. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1968;50:606–18.

    1. Deyo RA. Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a balancing act. Spine J. 2010;10:625–7.

    1. Chen J, Wang J, Wang B, et al. Post-surgical functional recovery, lumbar lordosis, and range of motion associated with MR-detectable redundant nerve roots in lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016;140:79–84.

    1. Hur JW, Hur JK, Kwon TH, et al. Radiological significance of ligamentum flavum hypertrophy in the occurrence of redundant nerve roots of central lumbar spinal stenosis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012;52:215.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on vk
VK
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Close Menu