. 2023 Jan 20;102(3):e32445.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032445.
Affiliations
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Orthopedics (III), Zhejiang Hospital, No.12 Lingyin Road, Hangzhou 310013, China.
- 2 Department of Orthopedics (I), 903RD Hospital of PLA, No.14 Lingyin Road, Hangzhou 310013, China.
Free PMC article
Item in Clipboard
Hang Yuan et al.
Medicine (Baltimore).
.
Free PMC article
Display options
Format
. 2023 Jan 20;102(3):e32445.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032445.
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Orthopedics (III), Zhejiang Hospital, No.12 Lingyin Road, Hangzhou 310013, China.
- 2 Department of Orthopedics (I), 903RD Hospital of PLA, No.14 Lingyin Road, Hangzhou 310013, China.
Item in Clipboard
Display options
Format
Abstract
To investigate the clinical effectiveness and feasibility of novel intervertebral space release without Smith-Petersen osteotomy/pedicle subtraction osteotomy/Ponte osteotomy in the treatment of adults with moderate to severe degenerative scoliosis. The data of 49 patients with moderate to severe degenerative scoliosis treated with a novel intervertebral space release and balance correction technique from January 2010 to January 2016 and followed up until January 2021 were collected based upon pre-designated inclusive and exclusive criteria for retrospective analyses. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and coronal Cobb angle were employed for the assessment of clinical symptoms and scoliosis correction improvements. Forty-nine patients were followed for a median time of 5.2 (1-11) years. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score was significantly increased from 9.45 ± 3.33 preoperatively to 19.65 ± 4.58 postoperatively (P < .001), and the coronal Cobb angle was significantly improved from 39.95º ± 9.04º preoperatively to 8.28º ± 4.21º (P < .001) after 1 year. There were no major complications occurred in patients. The novel intervertebral space release and balance correction at the original lesion and maximal unbalance site without vertebral osteotomy showed a promising clinical profile and may be considered as an alternative for the treatment of moderate to severe degenerative scoliosis.
Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
References
-
-
Birknes JK, White AP, Albert TJ, et al. . Adult degenerative scoliosis: a review. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(3 Suppl):94–103.
–
PubMed
-
-
-
Sansur CA, Smith JS, Coe JD, et al. . Scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality of adult scoliosis surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:E593–597.
–
PubMed
-
-
-
Drazin D, Shirzadi A, Rosner J, et al. . Complications and outcomes after spinal deformity surgery in the elderly: review of the existing literature and future directions. Neurosurg Focus. 2011;31:E3.
–
PubMed
-
-
-
Cho SK, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. . Major complications in revision adult deformity surgery: risk factors and clinical outcomes with 2- to 7-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37:489–500.
–
PubMed
-
-
-
Lenke LG, Newton PO, Sucato DJ, et al. . Complications after 147 consecutive vertebral column resections for severe pediatric spinal deformity: a multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38:119–32.
–
PubMed
-
MeSH terms
Cite