Vertebral Endplate Concavity in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Tapered 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage versus Squared PEEK Cage

February 26, 2023

doi: 10.3390/medicina59020372.

Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Naoki Segi et al.

Medicina (Kaunas).

2023.

doi: 10.3390/medicina59020372.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, 65 Tsurumai, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8560, Japan.
² Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Anjo Kosei Hospital, 28 Higashihirokute, Anjo 446-8602, Japan.

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

Background and Objectives: To prevent postoperative problems in extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), it is critical that the vertebral endplate not be injured. Unintentional endplate injuries may depend on the cage. A novel porous titanium cage for XLIF has improved geometry with a tapered tip and smooth surface. We hypothesized that this new cage should lead to fewer endplate injuries. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 32 patients (mean 74.1 ± 6.7 years, 22 females) who underwent anterior and posterior combined surgery with XLIF for lumbar degenerative disease or adult spinal deformity from January 2018 to June 2022. A tapered 3D porous titanium cage (3DTi; 11 patients) and a squared PEEK cage (sPEEK; 21 patients) were used. Spinal alignment values were measured on X-ray images. Vertebral endplate concavity (VEC) was defined as concavity ≥ 1 mm of the endplate on computed tomography (CT) images, which were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 week and 3 months postoperatively. Results: There were no significant differences in the patient demographic data and preoperative and 3-month postoperative spinal alignments between the groups. A 3DTi was used for 25 levels and an sPEEK was used for 38 levels. Preoperative local lordotic angles were 4.3° for 3DTi vs. 4.7° for sPEEK (p = 0.90), which were corrected to 12.3° and 9.1° (p = 0.029), respectively. At 3 months postoperatively, the angles were 11.6° for 3DTi and 8.2° for sPEEK (p = 0.013). VEC was present in 2 levels (8.0%) for 3DTi vs. 17 levels (45%) for sPEEK (p = 0.002). After 3 months postoperatively, none of the 3DTi had VEC progression; however, eight (21%) levels in sPEEK showed VEC progression (p = 0.019). Conclusions: The novel 3DTi cage reduced endplate injuries by reducing the endplate load during cage insertion.

Keywords:

cage subsidence; extreme lateral interbody fusion; lateral lumber interbody fusion; poly-ether-ether-ketone; three-dimensional porous titanium; vertebral endplate injury.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

**Figure 1**

Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis treated by 3DTi cage and PPS.

**Figure 2**

Flowchart for patients’ selection.

**Figure 3**

Appearance of 3DTi and sPEEK cages. The 3DTi cages are bullet-shaped and have smooth surfaces. The sPEEK cage has angular corners, spikes, and serrations.

**Figure 4**

Intervertebral lordotic angle was defined as the angle formed by the cephalad endplate of the upper vertebra and the caudal endplate of the lower vertebra for each level.

**Figure 5**

Vertebral endplate concavity (VEC) and cage subsidence. Both cages exceeded the end plates by ≥1 mm (VEC-positive) with Marchi classification grade 0.

**Figure 6**

Differences in postoperative changes depending on cage. (A), preoperative degenerated interbody; (B), postoperative VEC caused by the 3DTi cage; (C), no further subsidence after 3 months. (D), preoperative; (E), postoperative VEC caused by the sPEEK cage; (F), cage subsidence and decreased lordosis (11° to 6°) after three months.

Similar articles

PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence.

Campbell PG, Cavanaugh DA, Nunley P, Utter PA, Kerr E, Wadhwa R, Stone M.
Campbell PG, et al.
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Sep;49(3):E10. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20367.
Neurosurg Focus. 2020.

PMID: 32871573
Assessment and classification of subsidence after lateral interbody fusion using serial computed tomography.

Malham GM, Parker RM, Blecher CM, Seex KA.
Malham GM, et al.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Nov;23(5):589-597. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.SPINE14566. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015.

PMID: 26207320
Poor Bone Quality, Multilevel Surgery, and Narrow and Tall Cages Are Associated with Intraoperative Endplate Injuries and Late-onset Cage Subsidence in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review.

Wu H, Shan Z, Zhao F, Cheung JPY.
Wu H, et al.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jan 1;480(1):163-188. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001915.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022.

PMID: 34324459
Free PMC article.
[Application of three-dimensional printed porous titanium alloy cage and poly-ether-ether-ketone cage in posterior lumbar interbody fusion].

Wang Y, Zhou Y, Chai X, Zhuo H.
Wang Y, et al.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Sep 15;36(9):1126-1131. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202204011.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022.

PMID: 36111476
Free PMC article.

Clinical Trial.
Chinese.
Influence of the geometric and material properties of lumbar endplate on lumbar interbody fusion failure: a systematic review.

Yu Y, Robinson DL, Ackland DC, Yang Y, Lee PVS.
Yu Y, et al.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Apr 10;17(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03091-8.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022.

PMID: 35399075
Free PMC article.

Review.

References

1. Ozgur B.M., Aryan H.E., Pimenta L., Taylor W.R. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): A novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2006;6:435–443. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.012.
  
  –
  
  DOI
  
  –
  
  PubMed
1. Wu H., Shan Z., Zhao F., Cheung J.P.Y. Poor Bone Quality, Multilevel Surgery, and Narrow and Tall Cages Are Associated with Intraoperative Endplate Injuries and Late-onset Cage Subsidence in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2022;480:163–188. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001915.
  
  –
  
  DOI
  
  –
  
  PMC
  
  –
  
  PubMed
1. Tohmeh A.G., Khorsand D., Watson B., Zielinski X. Radiographical and Clinical Evaluation of Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion: Effects of Cage Size and Instrumentation Type with a Minimum of 1-Year Follow-up. Spine. 2014;39:E1582. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000645.
  
  –
  
  DOI
  
  –
  
  PubMed
1. Satake K., Kanemura T., Yamaguchi H., Segi N., Ouchida J. Predisposing Factors for Intraoperative Endplate Injury of Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion. Asian Spine J. 2016;10:907–914. doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.5.907.
  
  –
  
  DOI
  
  –
  
  PMC
  
  –
  
  PubMed
1. Kim Y.-H., Ha K.-Y., Kim K.-T., Chang D.-G., Park H.-Y., Yoon E.-J., Kim S.-I. Risk factors for intraoperative endplate injury during minimally-invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:20149. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99751-6.
  
  –
  
  DOI
  
  –
  
  PMC
  
  –
  
  PubMed

Grant support

This research received no external funding.

Additional articles :

Is It Possible to Get Better Results in Bone Fusion in Laminoplasty Surgery for Lumbar Stenosis? A N...

Assessment of Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion: A Systematic Review of Imaging-Based Fusion Criteria

New trends in spinal surgery: less invasive anatomical approach to the spine. The advantages of the ...

A modified posterior wedge osteotomy with interbody fusion for the treatment of thoracolumbar kyphos...