doi: 10.3390/jpm13020311.
Affiliations
Affiliations
- 1 Legacy Spine & Neurological Specialists, 8201 Cantrell Road, Ste. 265, Little Rock, AR 72227, USA.
- 2 Neurological and Spinal Surgery, Bryan Medical Center West, 2222 S. 16th Street, Ste. 305, Tower B, Lincoln, NE 68502, USA.
- 3 Neuroscience and Spine Associates, 6101 Pine Ridge Road, Ste. 101, Naples, FL 34119, USA.
- 4 Advanced Orthopedics, 499 E. Central Pkwy., Ste. 130, Altamonte Springs, FL 32701, USA.
- 5 Independent Consultant, 2210 Jackson Street, Ste. 401, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.
Item in Clipboard
Scott M Schlesinger et al.
J Pers Med.
.
Display options
Format
doi: 10.3390/jpm13020311.
Affiliations
- 1 Legacy Spine & Neurological Specialists, 8201 Cantrell Road, Ste. 265, Little Rock, AR 72227, USA.
- 2 Neurological and Spinal Surgery, Bryan Medical Center West, 2222 S. 16th Street, Ste. 305, Tower B, Lincoln, NE 68502, USA.
- 3 Neuroscience and Spine Associates, 6101 Pine Ridge Road, Ste. 101, Naples, FL 34119, USA.
- 4 Advanced Orthopedics, 499 E. Central Pkwy., Ste. 130, Altamonte Springs, FL 32701, USA.
- 5 Independent Consultant, 2210 Jackson Street, Ste. 401, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.
Item in Clipboard
Display options
Format
Abstract
(1) Background: The technological advances achieved with minimally-invasive surgery have enabled procedures to be undertaken in outpatient settings, and there has been growing acceptance of performing minimally-invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) in the ambulatory surgery center (ASC). The purposeof this study was to determine the comparative 30 day safety profile for patients treated with TLIF in the ASC versus the hospital setting. (2) Methods: This multi-center study retrospectively collected baseline characteristics, perioperative variables, and 30 day postoperative safety outcomes for patients having a TLIF using the VariLift®-LX expandable lumbar interbody fusion device. Outcomes were compared between patients undergoing TLIF in the ASC (n = 53) versus in the hospital (n = 114). (3) Results: Patients treated in-hospital were significantly older, frailer and more likely to have had previous spinal surgery than ASC patients. Preoperative back and leg pain scores were similar between study groups (median, 7). ASC patients had almost exclusively one-level procedures (98%) vs. 20% of hospital procedures involving two-levels (p = 0.004). Most procedures (>90%) employed a stand-alone device. The median length of stay for hospital patients was five times greater than for ASC patients (1.4 days vs. 0.3 days, p = 0.001). Emergency department visits, re-admissions and reoperations were rare whether the patients were managed in the traditional hospital setting or the ASC. (4) Conclusions: There were equivalent 30 day postoperative safety profiles for patients undergoing a minimally-invasive TLIF irrespective of surgical setting. For appropriately selected surgical candidates, the ASC offers a viable and attractive option for their TLIF procedure with the advantage of same-day discharge and at-home recovery.
Keywords:
22633; CPT ® 22630; TLIF; ambulatory surgery center; fusion; interbody cages; safety.
Conflict of interest statement
J.E.B. is an independent advisor to Wenzel Spine (Wenzel Spine, Austin, TX, USA) and received remuneration for manuscript development. S.M.S., B.R.G., M.B.G., and M.P.L. received no funding for this study and report no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Thirty-Day Outcomes From Standalone Minimally Invasive Surgery-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Patients in an Ambulatory Surgery Center vs. Hospital Setting.
Schlesinger S, Krugman K, Abbott D, Arle J.
Schlesinger S, et al.
Cureus. 2020 Sep 2;12(9):e10197. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10197.
Cureus. 2020.PMID: 33033675
Free PMC article. -
Outpatient Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Using Multimodal Analgesic Management in the Ambulatory Surgery Setting.
Parrish JM, Jenkins NW, Brundage TS, Hrynewycz NM, Podnar J, Buvanendran A, Singh K.
Parrish JM, et al.
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;14(6):970-981. doi: 10.14444/7146. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
Int J Spine Surg. 2020.PMID: 33560257
Free PMC article. -
Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
Massie LW, Zakaria HM, Schultz LR, Basheer A, Buraimoh MA, Chang V.
Massie LW, et al.
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17562.
Neurosurg Focus. 2018.PMID: 29290133
-
Practical answers to frequently asked questions in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery.
Shahi P, Vaishnav AS, Mai E, Kim JH, Dalal S, Song J, Shinn DJ, Melissaridou D, Araghi K, Urakawa H, Sivaganesan A, Lafage V, Qureshi SA, Iyer S.
Shahi P, et al.
Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.087. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
Spine J. 2023.PMID: 35843537
Review.
-
Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
Goldstein CL, Macwan K, Sundararajan K, Rampersaud YR.
Goldstein CL, et al.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Mar;24(3):416-27. doi: 10.3171/2015.2.SPINE14973. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016.PMID: 26565767
Review.
References
Grant support
This research received no external funding.