Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) in Incidental Segmental Fused Vertebra and Comparison With the Effect of Stabilization Systems on ASD

. 2021 Oct 10;13(10):e18647.


doi: 10.7759/cureus.18647.


eCollection 2021 Oct.

Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Mehdi Hekimoğlu et al.


Cureus.


.

Abstract

Objective Adjacent segment disease is a controversial process after spine stabilization. The two important factors discussed are natural aging and hypermobility in incidental segmental fusion anomalies; patients have two or more fused vertebrae from birth, which are the results of spinal movement restriction due to the fusion of some spinal units. This article’s main purpose is to determine the degree of relationship of hypermobility and the aging process in the deterioration of the disks adjacent to fusion. Methods In this study, the degenerative process developed by hypermobility in the adjacent segment due to incidental segmental fusion was evaluated. The MRI images of 52 adjacent and nonadjacent disks of 45 patients in total were analyzed according to the Pfirrmann grading systems. The average Pfirrmann rating of the disks just above and below the fused segment and the distant first, second, and third non-neighboring levels were evaluated and calculated, respectively. Results The highest rate of incidental fusion is determined on the cervical area with 51.9%, followed by the thoracal area with 32.7%, and the lumbar area with 15.4%. Damage to the adjacent segment disks in cases with incidental fusion can still be seen at any age, with fusion, indicating that the hypermobility effect plays a more prominent role. The evidence of hypermobility without aging is that the segments adjacent to fusion undergo more degeneration than the distant disks. Conclusion Adjacent segment disease is under the influence of many factors. Our findings suggest that its incidence is increasing with the pathological processes initiated by hypermobility. It seems that, at least, it carries equal importance as compared to age. Fusion surgeries damage the adjacent segments under the influence of the passage of time beyond the physiological aging of the patient.


Keywords:

adjacent segment disease; dynamic stabilization; fusion surgery; incidental fusion; spine stabilization.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures


Figure 1



Figure 1. Fused level distributions


Figure 2



Figure 2. Distribution of the cervical’s upper and lower Pfirrmann measurements


Figure 3



Figure 3. Distribution of the thoracal upper and lower Pfirrmann measurements


Figure 4



Figure 4. Distribution of the lumbar’s upper and lower Pfirrmann measurements

References

    1. Re-operation after long-segment fusions for adult spinal deformity: the impact of extending the construct below the lumbar spine. Witiw CD, Fessler RG, Nguyen S, et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx163. Neurosurgery. 2018;82:211–219.



      PubMed

    1. The prevalence of Klippel-Feil Syndrome: a computed tomography-based analysis of 2,917 patients. Gruber J, Saleh A, Bakhsh W, Rubery PT, Mesfin A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.12.002. Spine Deform. 2018;6:448–453.



      PubMed

    1. Klippel-Feil syndrome: clinical features and current understanding of etiology. Tracy MR, Dormans JP, Kusumi K. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15241163/ Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004:183–190.



      PubMed

    1. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:1873–1878.



      PubMed

    1. Surgical complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy in 251 patients. Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Oda T, Haku T, Yamamoto T, Iwasaki M. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2006.4.4.304. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;4:304–309.



      PubMed

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on vk
VK
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Close Menu