Analysis of treatment effect with teriparatide on device-related vertebral osteopenia after lumbar spinal interbody fusion using Hounsfield unit values: A retrospective cohort study

. 2022 Jul 15;101(28):e29677.


doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029677.

Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Masashi Miyazaki et al.


Medicine (Baltimore).


.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of teriparatide on device-related vertebral osteopenia after single lumbar spinal interbody fusion and compare osteopenia in fused and nonfused spinal segments using Hounsfield unit (HU) values. The present study was a retrospective cohort study. We reviewed 68 consecutive patients (28 men and 40 women) who underwent single-segment (L4-5) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cage and pedicle screw fixation. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether they were treated with teriparatide (teriparatide and nonmedication groups). The primary outcome measure was HU values measured on computed tomography images from each L1 to S1 vertebral body12-month postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures were femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD), T-score, osseous union, and clinical outcomes using the Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system 12-month postoperatively. There were significant decreases in HU values of lumbar vertebral bodies at all levels and BMD and T-score values obtained using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the femur between preoperative and postoperative 12-month computed tomography in the nonmedication group (P < .05). On the other hand, there were no significant differences between properative and postoperative 12-month HU values of each lumbar vertebral body and BMD values of the femur in the teriparatide group. Osseous fusion scores in the teriparatide group were significantly better than those in the nonmedication group. There were no significant differences in postoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association scores between the 2 groups. Administration of teriparatide during the perioperative period may prevent bone loss associated with spinal fusion surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

    1. McAfee PC, Farey ID, Sutterlin CE, et al. 1989 volvo award in basic science. Device-related osteoporosis with spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989;14:919–26.

    1. Lipscomb HJ, Grubb SA, Talmage RV. Spinal bone density following spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989;14:477–9.

    1. Bogdanffy GM, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD. Early changes in bone mineral density above a combined anteroposterior L4-S1 lumbar spinal fusion. A clinical investigation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20:1674–8.

    1. Myers MA, Casciani T, Whitbeck MG Jr, et al. Vertebral body osteopenia associated with posterolateral spine fusion in humans. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21:2368–71.

    1. Ito M, Fay LA, Ito Y, et al. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on instrumented posterolateral spinal fusion and device-related stress shielding. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22:382–8.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on vk
VK
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Close Menu