Review
. 2020 Jul;51(3):423-425.
doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2020.02.006.
Epub 2020 Mar 19.
Affiliations
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee-Campbell Clinic, 1211 Union Avenue, Suite 510, Memphis, TN 38104, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
- 2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee-Campbell Clinic, 1211 Union Avenue, Suite 510, Memphis, TN 38104, USA.
Item in Clipboard
Review
Catherine R Olinger et al.
Orthop Clin North Am.
.
. 2020 Jul;51(3):423-425.
doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2020.02.006.
Epub 2020 Mar 19.
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee-Campbell Clinic, 1211 Union Avenue, Suite 510, Memphis, TN 38104, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
- 2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee-Campbell Clinic, 1211 Union Avenue, Suite 510, Memphis, TN 38104, USA.
Item in Clipboard
Abstract
When the guidelines of the North American Spine Society concerning deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis were followed, only 2 (0.63%) of 315 patients with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions developed DVT complications over a 9-year period. Based on these findings, mechanical DVT prophylaxis appears to be adequate in patients undergoing elective spinal surgery, with no current support for pharmacologic prophylaxis.
Keywords:
Deep venous thrombosis; Minimally invasive spine surgery; Pulmonary embolism; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure Dr R.J. Gardocki is a speaker for JoiMax; Dr C.R. Olinger has nothing to disclose.
Citation text