doi: 10.1007/s10143-022-01772-w.
Online ahead of print.
Affiliations
Affiliations
- 1 Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
- 2 The Spine Center at Joint Implant Surgeons of Florida, Naples, FL, USA.
- 3 Department of Neurosurgery, Tulane Center for Clinical Neurosciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
- 4 Department of Neurosurgery, Tulane Center for Clinical Neurosciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA. [email protected].
- 5 Department of Neurology, Tulane Center for Clinical Neurosciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA. [email protected].
- 6 Department of Neurology, Tulane Center for Clinical Neurosciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
- 7 Department of Anatomical Sciences, St. George’s University, St. George’s, Grenada.
- 8 Department of Structural & Cellular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
- 9 Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
- 10 Department of Neurosurgery and Ochsner Neuroscience Institute, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA, USA.
- 11 University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Item in Clipboard
Evan Courville et al.
Neurosurg Rev.
.
Display options
Format
doi: 10.1007/s10143-022-01772-w.
Online ahead of print.
Affiliations
- 1 Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
- 2 The Spine Center at Joint Implant Surgeons of Florida, Naples, FL, USA.
- 3 Department of Neurosurgery, Tulane Center for Clinical Neurosciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
- 4 Department of Neurosurgery, Tulane Center for Clinical Neurosciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA. [email protected].
- 5 Department of Neurology, Tulane Center for Clinical Neurosciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA. [email protected].
- 6 Department of Neurology, Tulane Center for Clinical Neurosciences, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
- 7 Department of Anatomical Sciences, St. George’s University, St. George’s, Grenada.
- 8 Department of Structural & Cellular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
- 9 Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
- 10 Department of Neurosurgery and Ochsner Neuroscience Institute, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA, USA.
- 11 University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Item in Clipboard
Display options
Format
Abstract
Some authors have suggested that thigh extension during the prone lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine provides the theoretical advantage of providing posterior shift of the psoas muscle and plexus and is responsible for its lower rates of nerve injury. We aimed to elucidate the effects of surgical positioning on the femoral nerve within the psoas muscle via a cadaveric study. In the supine position, 10 fresh frozen adult cadavers had a metal wire secured to the pelvic segment of the femoral nerve and then extended proximally along with its L2 contribution. Fluoroscopy was then used to identify the wires on the femoral nerves in a neutral position and with the thigh extended and flexed by 25 and 45°. Additionally, a lateral incision was made in the anterolateral abdominal wall to mimic a lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine, and measurements were made of the amount of movement in the vertical plane of the femoral nerve from neutral to then 25 and 45° of thigh flexion and extension. On fluoroscopy, the femoral nerves moved posteriorly at a mean of 10.1 mm with thigh extension. Femoral nerve movement could not be detected at any degree of this range of flexion of the thigh. Extension of the thigh to about 30° can move the femoral nerve farther away from the dissection plane by approximately one centimeter. This hip extension not only places the femoral nerve in a more advantageous position for lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedures but also helps to promote accentuation of lumbar lordosis.
Keywords:
Anatomy; Complications; Injury; Lumbar plexus; Spine surgery.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
-
Davis M, Jenkins S, Bordes S et al (2019) Iliolumbar vein: anatomy and surgical importance during lateral transpsoas and oblique approaches to lumbar spine. World Neurosurg 128:e768–e772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.252
–
DOI
–
PubMed
-
-
-
Godzik J, Ohiorhenuan IE, Xu DS et al (2020) Single-position prone lateral approach: cadaveric feasibility study and early clinical experience. Neurosurg Focus 49(3):1–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20359
–
DOI
-
-
-
Grunert P, Drazin D, Iwanaga J et al (2017) Injury to the lumbar plexus and its branches after lateral fusion procedures: a cadaver study. World Neurosurg 105:519–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.027
–
DOI
–
PubMed
-
-
-
Iwanaga J, Singh V, Ohtsuka A et al (2021) Acknowledging the use of human cadaveric tissues in research papers: recommendations from anatomical journal editors. Clin Anat 34(1):2–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23671
–
DOI
–
PubMed
-
-
-
Lai O, Chen Y, Chen Q, Hu Y, Ma W (2021) Cadaveric biomechanical analysis of multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion with and without supplemental instrumentation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04151-6
–
DOI
-
Cite