Efficacy of the Dynesys Hybrid Surgery for Patients with Multi-Segmental Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

June 17, 2022

doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.849679.

eCollection 2022.

Xiao Xiao¹, Gaoyang Chen^{1

2}, Song Wang¹, Junliang Liu¹, Erhu Lin¹, Ke Chen¹, Yucheng Xiang¹, Ke Zhan¹, Congcong Liu¹, Zhengbin Yuan¹, Minjie Yang³, Shuyuan Zhong³, Wanxin Zhen¹, Dazhi Yang^{1

2}, Songlin Peng^{1

2}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital (Shenzhen People’s Hospital), Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
² Department of Spine, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Reconstruction of Structure and Function in Sports System, Shenzhen, China.
³ Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital (Shenzhen People’s Hospital), Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.

Item in Clipboard

Xiao Xiao et al.

Front Surg.

2022.

doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.849679.

eCollection 2022.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ Department of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital (Shenzhen People’s Hospital), Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
² Department of Spine, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Reconstruction of Structure and Function in Sports System, Shenzhen, China.
³ Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital (Shenzhen People’s Hospital), Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

Objective:

The efficacy of hybrid (Dynesys and fusion) surgery and the traditional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery was compared in patients with multi-segmental lumbar spinal stenosis.

Methods:

A total of 68 patients with multi-segmental lumbar spinal stenosis subjected to surgery were recruited between January 2013 and October 2020 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology. The patients were divided into a hybrid group (N = 33) and a TLIF group (N = 35) by surgery. After surgery, follow-up was conducted for 12 months. Between the two groups, the following parameters were compared: general conditions, clinical symptom scores, imaging parameters, and early complications.

Results:

A statistically significant difference in the duration of surgery was noted between the two groups. After 12 months of follow-up, the range of motion disappeared in the TLIF group, while 63.53% was preserved in the hybrid group with statistically significant differences. A statistically significant difference was identified in the Oswestry Disability Index one week after surgery. Nonetheless, no statistically significant differences were observed at the 12-month post-surgical follow-up. Pfirrmann grade showed a 3.03% upper adjacent segment degeneration rate in the hybrid group (1/33) at 12-month follow-up and 2.86% (1/35) in the TLIF group. Notably, no early complications (screw loosening and wound infection) were identified in the two groups.

Conclusion:

The Dynesys hybrid surgery combined the advantages of two systems of dynamic stabilization and rigid fusion. Besides, hybrid surgery is potentially a novel approach for the treatment of multi-segmental lumbar spinal stenosis.

Keywords:

dynamic internal fixation; hybrid surgery; lumbar spinal stenosis; spinal fusion; the Dynesys system.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.