Case Reports
doi: 10.1111/os.13668.
Online ahead of print.
Affiliations
Affiliations
- 1 Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
- 2 Department of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
- 3 Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Item in Clipboard
Case Reports
Guangming Xu et al.
Orthop Surg.
.
Display options
Format
doi: 10.1111/os.13668.
Online ahead of print.
Affiliations
- 1 Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
- 2 Department of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
- 3 Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Item in Clipboard
Display options
Format
Abstract
Background:
Cage retropulsion after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a common complication that is more frequently detected in the early postoperative period. Revision in the early stages is relatively less difficult in symptomatic cases. However, cage retropulsion is quite rare for patients with intervertebral osseous fusion in the long term after TLIF, and there are no relevant reports related to the revision plan.
Case presentation:
Here, we report a case of a patient who underwent L4-S1 TLIF at another hospital 4 years ago, accompanied by recurrent pain and discomfort of the left lower limb after the operation. Due to recent condition aggravation, it was considered to be caused by compression of the nerve root due to cage retropulsion. Nerve root sealing and endoscopy surgery were performed on the operative segment. It was found that cage retropulsion at the L4/5 level was a suspicious focus according to careful analysis of the clinical manifestations of the patient. Selective block of the nerve root on the level resulted in relief of the patient’s original symptoms. After the posterior edge of the cage was exposed under the endoscope through an intervertebral foramen approach, the posterior edge of the cage protruding into the spinal canal was removed by high-speed burr grinding, working casing reduction and other methods. Postoperative symptoms of pain in the low back and lower limb were relieved completely.
Conclusions:
It is feasible to use the power system to remove the retrograde cage under the endoscope through the intervertebral foramen approach for the revision of symptomatic polyether ether ketone (PEEK) cage retropulsion in the long term after TLIF.
Keywords:
Cage retropulsion; Case report; High-speed burr; Intervertebral foramen approach.
© 2023 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
References
-
-
Zhu H, Zhong W, Zhang P, Liu X, Huang J, Liu F, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of autologous bone-cage in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;1:379.
-
-
-
Chen YN, Chang CW. Computational comparison of three different cage porosities in posterior lumbar interbody fusion with porous cage. Comput Biol Med. 2021;139:105036.
-
-
-
Zhu C, Zhang L, Pan H, Zhang W. Lumbar interbody fusion with bilateral cages using a biportal endoscopic technique with a third portal. Acta Neurochir. 2022;9:2343-7.
-
-
-
Tanaka M, Wei Z, Kanamaru A, Masuda S, Fujiwara Y, Uotani K, et al. Revision for cage migration after transforaminal/posterior lumbar interbody fusion: how to perform revision surgery? BMC Surg. 2022;1:172.
-
-
-
Peng L, Guo J, Lu JP, Jin S, Wang P, Shen HY. Risk factors and scoring system of cage retropulsion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective observational study. Orthop Surg. 2021;3:855-62.
-
Cite