. 2022 Mar;16(S1):S61-S68.
doi: 10.14444/8237.
Affiliations
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- 2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- 3 Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
- 4 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA.
- 5 Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA [email protected].
Item in Clipboard
Julie L Chan et al.
Int J Spine Surg.
2022 Mar.
Display options
Format
. 2022 Mar;16(S1):S61-S68.
doi: 10.14444/8237.
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- 2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- 3 Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
- 4 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA.
- 5 Department of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA [email protected].
Item in Clipboard
Display options
Format
Abstract
Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is an advantageous approach for spinal arthrodesis for a wide range of spinal disorders including degenerative, genetic, and traumatic conditions. LLIF techniques have evolved over the past 15 years regarding surgical approach, with concomitant improvements in implant material design. Bioactive materials have been a focus in the development of novel methods, which reduce the risk of subsidence and pseudarthrosis. Historically, polyetheretherketone and titanium cages have been selected for their advantageous biomechanical properties; however, both have their limitations, regarding optimal modulus or osseointegrative properties. Recent modifications to these 2 materials have focused on devising bioactive implants, which may enhance the rate of bony fusion in spinal arthrodesis by addressing the shortcomings of each. Specific emphasis has been placed on developing improvements in surface coating, porosity, microroughness, and nanotopography of interbody cages. This has been coupled with advances in additive manufacturing to generate cages with ideal biomechanical properties. Three-dimensional-printed titanium cages may be particularly beneficial in spinal arthrodesis during LLIF and reduce the historical rates of subsidence and pseudarthrosis by combining a number of these putatively beneficial biomaterial properties.
Keywords:
PEEK; bioactive implants; biologics; fusion; osseointegration; subsidence; surface technology; titanium.
This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2022 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.
Cite