First Clinical Experience with a Novel 3D C-Arm-Based System for Navigated Percutaneous Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Placement

. 2022 Aug 17;58(8):1111.


doi: 10.3390/medicina58081111.

Affiliations

Free PMC article

Item in Clipboard

Eric Mandelka et al.


Medicina (Kaunas).


.

Free PMC article

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Navigated pedicle screw placement is becoming increasingly popular, as it has been shown to reduce the rate of screw misplacement. We present our intraoperative workflow and initial experience in terms of safety, efficiency, and clinical feasibility with a novel system for a 3D C-arm cone beam computed-tomography-based navigation of thoracolumbar pedicle screws. Materials and Methods: The first 20 consecutive cases of C-arm cone beam computed-tomography-based percutaneous pedicle screw placement using a novel navigation system were included in this study. Procedural data including screw placement time and patient radiation dose were prospectively collected. Final pedicle screw accuracy was assessed using the Gertzbein-Robbins grading system. Results: In total, 156 screws were placed. The screw accuracy was 94.9%. All the pedicle breaches occurred on the lateral pedicle wall, and none caused clinical complications. On average, a time of 2:42 min was required to place a screw. The mean intraoperative patient radiation exposure was 7.46 mSv. Conclusions: In summary, the investigated combination of C-arm CBCT-based navigation proved to be easy to implement and highly reliable. It facilitates the accurate and efficient percutaneous placement of pedicle screws in the thoracolumbar spine. The careful use of intraoperative imaging maintains the intraoperative radiation exposure to the patient at a moderate level.


Keywords:

accuracy; intraoperative imaging; minimally invasive spine surgery; navigation; pedicle screw placement; radiation exposure; screw placement time.

Conflict of interest statement

P.A.G. and J.F. serve as unpaid members of a consulting/advisory board for Siemens Healthineers. The other authors declare that they have no financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures


Figure 1



Figure 1

Different intraoperative settings for (a) upper thoracic procedures and (b) mid/lower thoracic and lumbosacral procedures. The system is placed at the end of the operating table for ergonomic viewing. 1: surgeons, 2: scrub nurse, 3: anesthesiologist/anesthesiologic nurse, A: anesthesiology unit, C: camera unit, C-arm: 3D C-arm, I: instrumentation trays, Nav: navigation monitor cart, OT: operating table, Tro: C-arm Trolley.


Figure 2



Figure 2

(a) Flat panel detector of the C-arm Cios Spin with sterile draping and referencing array. The spheres are only mounted on the side used for the procedure; (b) patient array attached to a spinous process close to the region of interest.


Figure 3



Figure 3

Screenshots of the navigation software during screw insertion with visualization of the planned position of the screw and with the correctly positioned screw.


Figure 4



Figure 4

Screw accuracy: (a) percentage of screws according to different Gertzbein–Robbins system (GRS) grades. A: GRS grade A, B: GRS grade B, C: GRS grade C, D: GRS grade D, E: GRS grade E. (b) distance between the pedicle screws and the medial/lateral cortices with the area marked in red depicting perforations ≥ 2 mm. RL: right lateral, RM: right medial, LM: left medial, LL: left lateral.

References

    1. Rosinski A.A., Mittal A., Odeh K., Ungurean V., Leasure J., Telles C., Kondrashov D. Alternatives to Traditional Pedicle Screws for Posterior Fixation of the Degenerative Lumbar Spine. JBJS Rev. 2021;9:e20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00177.



      DOI



      PubMed

    1. Roy-Camille R., Saillant G., Berteaux D., Salgado V. Osteosynthesis of thoraco-lumbar spine fractures with metal plates screwed through the vertebral pedicles. Reconstr. Surg. Traumatol. 1976;15:2–16.



      PubMed

    1. Verma K., Boniello A., Rihn J. Emerging Techniques for Posterior Fixation of the Lumbar Spine. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2016;24:357–364. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00378.



      DOI



      PubMed

    1. Boucher H.H. A method of spinal fusion. J. Bone Jt. Surgery. Br. Vol. 1959;41:248–259. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.41B2.248.



      DOI



      PubMed

    1. Mobbs R.J., Sivabalan P., Li J. Technique, challenges and indications for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2011;18:741–749. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.09.019.



      DOI



      PubMed

MeSH terms

Grant support

The research group received grants/has grants pending and technical support from Siemens Healthineers (Erlangen, Germany) and NuVasive (San Diego, CA, USA).

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on vk
VK
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Close Menu