From clinic to hypothesis, an innovative operation for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in a minimal invasive way

July 16, 2020

. 2020 Jun 19;144:110007.

doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110007.

Online ahead of print.

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopaedic, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, PR China.
² Orthopaedic Department, Heze Municipal Hospital, Heze, Shandong, PR China.
³ Pain Medicine Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, PR China.
⁴ Department of Orthopaedic, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, PR China; Pain Medicine Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, PR China. Electronic address: [email protected].

Item in Clipboard

Chuanchao Du et al.

Med Hypotheses.

2020.

. 2020 Jun 19;144:110007.

doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110007.

Online ahead of print.

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopaedic, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, PR China.
² Orthopaedic Department, Heze Municipal Hospital, Heze, Shandong, PR China.
³ Pain Medicine Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, PR China.
⁴ Department of Orthopaedic, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, PR China; Pain Medicine Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, PR China. Electronic address: [email protected].

Item in Clipboard

Abstract

Concerning the damage to back muscles and posterior ligament complex (PLC) by posterior open approach for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), the oblique lateral intervertebral fusion (OLIF) is pretty popular nowadays. However, oblique lateral approach has obvious drawbacks, which are limited vision and operative scope for achieving spinal canal decompression. Herein, we present a hypothesis that lumbar canal decompression can be well achieved by OLIF combined with spinal endoscope operative system. Nerval decompression and spinal reconstruction are achieved in a minimal invasive way, which may play an instructive role for the treatment of serious LSS.

Keywords:

Decompression; Intervertebral fusion; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Oblique lateral interbody fusion; Spinal endoscopes.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Similar articles

Radiographic evaluation of indirect decompression of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerated lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Sato J, Ohtori S, Orita S, Yamauchi K, Eguchi Y, Ochiai N, Kuniyoshi K, Aoki Y, Nakamura J, Miyagi M, Suzuki M, Kubota G, Inage K, Sainoh T, Fujimoto K, Shiga Y, Abe K, Kanamoto H, Inoue G, Takahashi K.
Sato J, et al.
Eur Spine J. 2017 Mar;26(3):671-678. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4170-0. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
Eur Spine J. 2017.

PMID: 26245906
[Early effectiveness of oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with pedicle screw fixation via small incision Wiltse approach for lumbar spondylolisthesis].

Hu B, Yu L, Liao Q.
Hu B, et al.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 15;34(3):294-299. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201902037.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020.

PMID: 32174072

Chinese.
Minimally Invasive Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Spinal Endoscope Assistance: Technical Note.

Heo DH, Choi WS, Park CK, Kim JS.
Heo DH, et al.
World Neurosurg. 2016 Dec;96:530-536. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.033. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
World Neurosurg. 2016.

PMID: 27641264
Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.

Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ.
Mobbs RJ, et al.
J Spine Surg. 2015 Dec;1(1):2-18. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05.
J Spine Surg. 2015.

PMID: 27683674
Free PMC article.

Review.
Development and Application of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Li R, Li X, Zhou H, Jiang W.
Li R, et al.
Orthop Surg. 2020 Apr;12(2):355-365. doi: 10.1111/os.12625. Epub 2020 Mar 15.
Orthop Surg. 2020.

PMID: 32174024

Review.