Good clinical outcomes in nonunion cases after facet fusion with a percutaneous pedicle screw system for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis


doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01479-4.


Online ahead of print.

Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Tomohiro Miyashita et al.


Neurosurg Rev.


.

Abstract

There are many satisfactory long-term outcomes after posterolateral fusion (PLF) for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS); nonunion cases have also achieved good clinical outcomes. Facet fusion (FF), a minimally invasive evolution of PLF, also resulted in good clinical outcomes. We aimed to assess the course of nonunion cases after FF and determine whether the nonunion cases achieved good clinical outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 136 patients who underwent FF for DLS. Range of motion (ROM) at the fused level was measured using a flexion-extension lateral radiograph preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Patients were classified into the Fusion or Unconfirmed Fusion group by computed tomography (CT) 1 year postoperatively. Furthermore, patients in the Unconfirmed Fusion group were classified into the Delayed Union or Nonunion group depending on the confirmation status of FF upon the following CT. The average preoperative ROM and clinical outcomes were compared between the three groups. The Fusion, Delayed Union, and Nonunion groups had 109, 14, and 13 patients, respectively. In the Nonunion group, the average ROM significantly decreased from 13.0° preoperatively to 4.9° postoperatively. There was a significant difference in the average preoperative ROM between the groups. The larger the preoperative ROM, the fewer facets fused. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups. Five patients (3.7%) required revision surgery for adjacent segment disease 1-5.5 years after FF. Even nonunion cases after FF achieved good clinical outcomes, likely because the unstable spondylolisthesis was stabilized. FF did not require revision surgery for nonunion itself.


Keywords:

Facet joint fusion; Posterolateral fusion; Preoperative intervertebral instability; Pseudarthrosis; Range of motion; Stabilization.

References

    1. Agabegi SS, Majid K, Fischgrund JS, Vaccaro AR, Patel T (2011) Can preoperative radiographic parameters be used to predict fusion in non-instrumented posterolateral fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(26):E1709–E1714. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821d289f



      DOI

    1. Andersen T, Videbæk TS, Hansen ES, Bünger C, Christensen FB (2008) The positive effect of posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion is preserved at long-term follow-up: a RCT with 11–13 year follow-up. Eur Spine J 17(2):272–280 Epub 2007 Sep 12



      DOI

    1. Blumenthal C, Curran J, Benzel EC, Potter R, Magge SN, Harrington JF Jr, Coumans JV, Ghogawala Z (2013) Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 18(4):340–346. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.1.SPINE12537



      DOI



      PubMed

    1. Challier V, Boissiere L, Obeid I, Vital JM, Castelain JE, Bénard A, Ong N, Ghailane S, Pointillart V, Mazas S, Mariey R, Gille O (2017) One-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and posterior approach: Is transforaminal lateral interbody fusion mandatory?: a randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42(8):531–539. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001857



      DOI

    1. Chrastil J, Patel AA (2012) Complications associated with posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20(5):283–291. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-20-05-283



      DOI



      PubMed

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on vk
VK
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Close Menu