doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05318-3.
Online ahead of print.
Affiliations
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Shijingshan District, No. 9, Jinyuanzhuang Rd, Beijing, 100144, China.
- 2 Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Shijingshan District, No. 9, Jinyuanzhuang Rd, Beijing, 100144, China. [email protected].
Item in Clipboard
Wenlong Wang et al.
Acta Neurochir (Wien).
.
Display options
Format
doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05318-3.
Online ahead of print.
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Shijingshan District, No. 9, Jinyuanzhuang Rd, Beijing, 100144, China.
- 2 Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Shijingshan District, No. 9, Jinyuanzhuang Rd, Beijing, 100144, China. [email protected].
Item in Clipboard
Display options
Format
Abstract
Background:
Lumbar fusion with rigid fixation can be complicated by adjacent segment degeneration, which may cause neurological deficits and back pain, and occasionally necessitates revision surgery. This type of revision surgery is difficult to perform in a minimally invasive manner because it requires the revision of the original internal fixation instruments.
Method:
We describe a biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS) procedure for revision surgery due to adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion with rigid fixation instruments. The radiological images and complete surgical procedure are presented.
Conclusions:
BESS effectively enabled nerve decompression, intervertebral fusion, and revision of lumbar fusion with fixation instruments in a minimally invasive manner.
Keywords:
Adjacent segment disease; Biportal endoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery; Revision.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
-
Adogwa O, Parker SL, Mendenhall SK (2013) Laminectomy and extension of instrumented fusion improves 2-year pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with adjacent segment disease: defining the long-term effectiveness of surgery. World Neurosurg 80(6):893–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2011.12.082
–
DOI
–
PubMed
-
-
-
Harrop JS, Youssef JA, Maltenfort M (2008) Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(15):1701–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31817bb956
–
DOI
-
-
-
Helgeson MD, Bevevino AJ, Hilibrand AS (2013) Update on the evidence for adjacent segment degeneration and disease. Spine J 13(3):342–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2012.12.009
–
DOI
–
PubMed
-
-
-
Hilibrand AS, Robbins M (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 4(6 Suppl):190S-194S. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.007
–
DOI
–
PubMed
-
-
-
Tan QC, Wang D, Yang Z (2021) Implant preservation versus implant replacement in revision surgery for adjacent segment disease after thoracolumbar instrumentation: a retrospective study of 43 patients. World Neurosurg 150:e511–e519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.03.046
–
DOI
–
PubMed
-
Cite