Intraoperative image guidance for endoscopic spine surgery

Review


doi: 10.21037/atm-20-1119.

Affiliations

Item in Clipboard

Review

Jason I Liounakos et al.


Ann Transl Med.


2021 Jan.

Abstract

Endoscopic spine surgery is a burgeoning component of the minimally invasive spine surgeon’s armamentarium. The goals of minimally invasive, and likewise endoscopic, spine surgery include providing equivalent or better patient outcomes compared to conventional open surgery, while minimizing soft tissue disruption, blood loss, postoperative pain, recovery time, and time to return to normal activities. A multitude of indications for the utilization of endoscopy throughout the spinal axis now exist, with applications for both decompression as well as interbody fusion. That being said, spinal endoscopy requires many spine surgeons to learn a completely new skill set and the associated learning curve may be substantial. Fluoroscopy is most common imaging modality used in endoscopic spine surgery for the localization of spinal pathology and endoscopic access. Recently, the use of navigation has been reported to be effective, with preliminary data supporting decreased operative times and radiation exposure, as well as providing for improvements in the associated learning curve. A further development is the recent interest in combining robotic guidance with spinal endoscopy, particularly with respect to endoscopic-assisted lumbar fusion. While there is currently a paucity of literature evaluating these image modalities, they are gaining traction, and future research and innovation will likely focus on these new technologies.


Keywords:

Endoscopy; image guidance; minimally invasive surgery (MIS); navigation; spine.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-1119). The series “Current State of Intraoperative Imaging” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. MYW reports personal fees from Depuy-Synthes Spine, personal fees from Spineology, personal fees from Stryker, personal fees from Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, personal fees from Springer Publishing, personal fees from Quality Medical Publishing, personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from Globus Medical, other from Innovative Surgical Devices, other from Medical Device Partners, outside the submitted work. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on vk
VK
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Close Menu