Background context:

Cage subsidence is one of the most common complications following lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Low bone mineral density (BMD) is an important risk factor that contributes to cage subsidence. Hounsfield units (HU) obtained from clinical computed tomography (CT) scans provided a reliable method for determining regional BMD. The association between HU and cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) remains unclear.

Purpose:

The objective of this study is to evaluate the association between vertebral HU value and cage subsidence following OLIF.

Study design/setting:

A retrospective study.

Patient sample:

Adults with degenerative spinal conditions underwent single-level OLIF at our institution from October 2017 and August 2020 OUTCOME MEASURES: Cage subsidence, disc height, vertebral body global HU value, upper and lower instrumented vertebrae HU value, endplate HU value, fusion rate.

Methods:

This retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent single-level OLIF at one institution between October 2017 and August 2020. Cage subsidence was measured using the CT scan postoperatively based on the cage protrusion through the vertebral endplates. The HU values were measured from preoperative CT according to previously reported methods.

Results:

A total of 70 patients with a mean follow-up of 15.4 months were included in the analysis. The subsidence rate was 25.7% (n=18/70). The average cage subsidence was 2.2 mm, with a range of 0-7.7 mm. No significant difference was found in age, sex, or body mass index (BMI) between the two groups. The mean global HU value of the lumbar vertebral body (L1-5) was 142.7±30.1 in nonsubsidence and 103.7±11.5 in subsidence (p=0.004). The upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) HU value was 141.4±29.7 in the nonsubsidence and 101.1±10.2 in subsidence, (p=0.005). The lower instrumented vertebrae (LIV) HU value was 147.4±34.9 in nonsubsidence and 108.1±13.7 in subsidence, (p<0.001). The AUC of the UIV HU value was 0.917 (95% CI: 0.853-0.981), and the most appropriate threshold of the HU value was 115 (sensitivity: 84.6%, specificity: 100%). The AUC of the LIV HU value was 0.893 (95%CI: 0.819-0.966), and the most appropriate threshold of the HU value was 125 (sensitivity: 76.9%, specificity: 100%). The mean upper endplate HU value was 235.4±50.9, and the mean lower endplate HU value was 193.4±40.3. No significant difference (upper endplate p=0.314, lower endplate p=0.189) was observed between the two groups.

Conslusions:

Lower preoperative vertebral body HU values were associated with cage subsidence after single-level OLIF. However, the endplate HU values were not associated with cage subsidence. Preoperative HU measurement is useful in the prediction of the cage subsidence.