doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0022.
Online ahead of print.
Affiliations
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Orthopaedics, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
- 2 People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
- 3 Department of Orthopaedics, The First People’s Hospital of Fuyang, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Item in Clipboard
Mengran Jin et al.
J Comp Eff Res.
.
doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0022.
Online ahead of print.
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Orthopaedics, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
- 2 People’s Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
- 3 Department of Orthopaedics, The First People’s Hospital of Fuyang, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Item in Clipboard
Abstract
Aim: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic-assisted lumbar interbody fusion (PELIF) versus oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) for the treatment of symptomatic low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis. Material & methods: The clinical and radiographic records of 48 patients underwent single-level minimally invasive lumbar fusion with a PELIF (n = 16) or OLIF (n = 32) were reviewed. Results: The clinical and radiographic outcomes were similar in both groups. PELIF procedure exhibited superior capability of the enlargement of foraminal width, but inferior capability of the restoration of foraminal height than OLIF procedure. Conclusion: PELIF minimizes the iatrogenic damages and perioperative risks to a great extent, and seems to be a promising option for the treatment of symptomatic low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Keywords:
comparative effectiveness research; low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis; oblique lumbar interbody fusion; percutaneous endoscopic interbody fusion.
Similar articles
-
Minimally invasive surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: transforaminal or oblique lumbar interbody fusion.
Sheng SR, Geng YB, Zhou KL, Wu AM, Wang XY, Ni WF.
Sheng SR, et al.
J Comp Eff Res. 2020 Jan;9(1):45-51. doi: 10.2217/cer-2019-0055. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
J Comp Eff Res. 2020.PMID: 31838875
-
Comparative Study of the Difference of Perioperative Complication and Radiologic Results: MIS-DLIF (Minimally Invasive Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion) Versus MIS-OLIF (Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion).
Jin J, Ryu KS, Hur JW, Seong JH, Kim JS, Cho HJ.
Jin J, et al.
Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Feb;31(1):31-36. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000474.
Clin Spine Surg. 2018.PMID: 28059946
Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion with Percutaneous Posterior Fixation in Lateral Position and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
Koike Y, Kotani Y, Terao H, Iwasaki N.
Koike Y, et al.
Asian Spine J. 2020 Jun 12. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0342. Online ahead of print.
Asian Spine J. 2020.PMID: 32521951
-
Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.
Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ.
Mobbs RJ, et al.
J Spine Surg. 2015 Dec;1(1):2-18. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05.
J Spine Surg. 2015.PMID: 27683674
Free PMC article.Review.
-
Review of early clinical results and complications associated with oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF).
Phan K, Maharaj M, Assem Y, Mobbs RJ.
Phan K, et al.
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Sep;31:23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.02.030. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
J Clin Neurosci. 2016.PMID: 27349468
Review.