doi: 10.1002/jor.25069.
Online ahead of print.
Affiliations
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
- 2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Charité University Hospital Berlin Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
- 3 Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Item in Clipboard
Stephan N Salzmann et al.
J Orthop Res.
.
Display options
Format
doi: 10.1002/jor.25069.
Online ahead of print.
Authors
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
- 2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Charité University Hospital Berlin Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
- 3 Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Item in Clipboard
Display options
Format
Abstract
The objective of this study is to determine bone mineral density (BMD) changes in adjacent vertebra following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Consecutive patients undergoing ACDF with available preoperative and postoperative CT imaging were included. Quantitative computed tomography measurements of screw-free cervical and first thoracic vertebra were performed. Comparisons between pre- and post-operative BMD in the vertebrae one or two levels above the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV+1, UIV+2) and one level below the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV+1) were assessed. 72 patients (men, 66.7%) met inclusion criteria. The patient population was 91.7% Caucasian with a mean age of 55.0 years. The mean interval (± SD) between surgery and secondary CT was 157 ± 23 days. Preoperative BMD (± SD) in UIV+1 was 300.6 ± 66.2 mg/cm3. There was a significant BMD loss of 1.5% at UIV+1 after surgery, resulting in a postoperative BMD of 296.2 ± 64.8 mg/cm3 (p=0.029). At UIV+2 and LIV+1, no significant differences between pre- and post-operative BMD (304.7 ± 75.7 mg/cm3 vs. 299.8 ± 74.3 mg/cm3, 197.3 ± 50.4 mg/cm3 vs. 200.8 ± 48.7 mg/cm3, p= 0.113 and p=0.078, respectively) were observed. Clinical Significance: Our results demonstrate a small BMD decrease of 1.5% at UIV+1. This suggests that the effect of ACDF surgery on the adjacent levels might be smaller compared to the previously described lumbar BMD loss of 10-20% following posterior lumbar fusion procedures. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; bone mineral density; osteoporosis; postoperative change; quantitative computed tomography.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Postoperative decrease of regional volumetric bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography after lumbar fusion surgery in adjacent vertebrae.
Okano I, Jones C, Salzmann SN, Miller CO, Shirahata T, Rentenberger C, Shue J, Carrino JA, Sama AA, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP, Hughes AP.
Okano I, et al.
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Jun;31(6):1163-1171. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05367-3. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
Osteoporos Int. 2020.PMID: 32170396
-
Regional bone mineral density differences measured by quantitative computed tomography in patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery.
Salzmann SN, Okano I, Ortiz Miller C, Chiapparelli E, Reisener MJ, Winter F, Shue J, Carrino JA, Sama AA, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP, Hughes AP.
Salzmann SN, et al.
Spine J. 2020 Jul;20(7):1056-1064. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
Spine J. 2020.PMID: 32087388
-
Association between bicortical screw fixation at upper instrumented vertebra and risk for upper instrumented vertebra fracture.
Park YS, Hyun SJ, Choi HY, Kim KJ, Jahng TA.
Park YS, et al.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 May;26(5):638-644. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16535. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017.PMID: 28291409
-
The association between lower Hounsfield units of the upper instrumented vertebra and proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity surgery with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Duan PG, Mummaneni PV, Rivera J, Guinn JMV, Wang M, Xi Z, Li B, Wu HH, Ames CP, Burch S, Berven SH, Chou D.
Duan PG, et al.
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Aug;49(2):E7. doi: 10.3171/2020.5.FOCUS20192.
Neurosurg Focus. 2020.PMID: 32738804
-
End Vertebra Versus Apical Vertebra: Where Are We More Likely to Misplace in Spine Deformity?
Sarwahi V, Wendolowski SF, Lo Y, Thornhill B, Amaral T.
Sarwahi V, et al.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2020 Feb;40(2):53-59. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001102.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2020.PMID: 31923163
Cite