. 2020 Dec 21;56(12):E723.
doi: 10.3390/medicina56120723.
Affiliations
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.
- 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung 20401, Taiwan.
- 3 College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.
Item in Clipboard
Cheng-Yu Li et al.
Medicina (Kaunas).
.
Display options
Format
. 2020 Dec 21;56(12):E723.
doi: 10.3390/medicina56120723.
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.
- 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung 20401, Taiwan.
- 3 College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.
Item in Clipboard
Display options
Format
Abstract
Background and objectives: The prevalence of degenerative lumbar spine diseases has increased. In addition to standard lumbar decompression and/or fusion techniques, implantation of interspinous process devices (IPDs) can provide clinical benefits in highly selected patients. However, changes in spinal structures after IPD implantation using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have rarely been discussed. This volumetric study aimed to evaluate the effect of IPD implantation on the intervertebral disc and foramen using three-dimensional assessment. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with lumbar degenerative disc diseases treated with IPD implantation and foraminotomy and/or discectomy between January 2016 and December 2019. The mean follow-up period was 13.6 months. The perioperative lumbar MRI data were processed for 3D-volumetric analysis. Clinical outcomes, including the Prolo scale and visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and radiographic outcomes, such as the disc height, foraminal area, and translation, were analyzed. Results: Fifty patients were included in our study. At the one-year follow-up, the VAS and Prolo scale scores significantly improved (both p < 0.001). The disc height and foraminal area on radiographs also increased significantly, but with limited effects up to three months postoperatively. MRI revealed an increased postoperative disc height with a mean difference of 0.5 ± 0.1 mm (p < 0.001). Although the mean disc volume difference did not significantly increase, the mean foraminal volume difference was 0.4 ± 0.16 mm3 (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In select patients with degenerative disc diseases or lumbar spinal stenosis, the intervertebral foramen was enlarged, and disc loading was reduced after IPD implantation with decompression surgery. The 3D findings were compatible with the clinical benefits.
Keywords:
DIAM; decompression; degenerative lumbar spine diseases; interspinous process device; magnetic resonance imaging; three-dimensional.