Review
. 2021 Mar 20;S1529-9430(21)00127-3.
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.03.016.
Online ahead of print.
Affiliations
Affiliation
- 1 University of Sydney, Department of Science, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: [email protected].
Item in Clipboard
Review
Hugh A Fenton-White.
Spine J.
.
Display options
Format
. 2021 Mar 20;S1529-9430(21)00127-3.
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.03.016.
Online ahead of print.
Affiliation
- 1 University of Sydney, Department of Science, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: [email protected].
Item in Clipboard
Display options
Format
Abstract
Today, the Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF), and related methods of fusion, represent the gold standard in spinal arthrodesis. However, despite the PLIF being first performed in the 1940s, its reputation was marked by animosity for the next fifty years. Only due to the extraordinary talent and perseverance from a small group of pioneers, was the operation eventually appreciated to be an ideal fusion technique. This process of popularisation has assisted the surgical community to better recognise the complexities of spinal biomechanics and has encouraged the momentum of success in modern spinal surgery. Neither the complete origins of the technique, nor the remarkable story of its propagation, have previously been reported.
Keywords:
Controversy; History; Innovation; Instrumentation; PLIF; Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion; Spinal Fusion; Surgery.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Cite