Case Reports
. 2021 Oct 24;13(10):e19004.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.19004.
eCollection 2021 Oct.
Affiliations
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, TWN.
- 2 School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TWN.
- 3 Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TWN.
Item in Clipboard
Case Reports
Wan-Chi Chiang et al.
Cureus.
.
Display options
Format
. 2021 Oct 24;13(10):e19004.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.19004.
eCollection 2021 Oct.
Affiliations
- 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, TWN.
- 2 School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TWN.
- 3 Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, TWN.
Item in Clipboard
Display options
Format
Abstract
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) offers the potential benefits of anterior and posterior column decompression and fusion. Pseudarthrosis and infection are among the most common perioperative complications. Vertebral fracture after TLIF is a rare and unusual complication. A 74-year-old female underwent L3-5 TLIF for lumbar spondylolisthesis that caused back pain and neurogenic claudication. She recovered well after surgery. However, she subsequently experienced progressive back pain and recurrent claudication after a fall. Elongated anterior-posterior length of the L5 body with progressive L5-S1 listhesis was observed in the serial radiographic follow-ups. The CT scan revealed complicated fracture lines crossing the L5 body. Further extended fixation was performed for decompression and reconstruction of the lumbosacral alignment. Although vertebral fracture after TLIF is a rare complication, a high index of suspicion is the key to early diagnosis, preferably with CT scans, for patients with traumatic accidents after TLIF surgery.
Keywords:
computed tomography; spondyolisthesis; tlif; trauma; vertebral facture.
Copyright © 2021, Chiang et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures

Figure 1. Preoperative radiograph and MRI
Figure 1. Preoperative radiograph and MRI
Illustration of the preoperative radiograph with L3-4 retrolisthesis and…
Figure 1. Preoperative radiograph and MRI
Illustration of the preoperative radiograph with L3-4 retrolisthesis and Meyerding Grade II spondylolisthesis over L4-5 (A), and the T2-weighted MRI with spinal stenosis over L3-5 (B) MRI: magnetic resonance imaging

Figure 2. Series of radiographs during subsequent…
Figure 2. Series of radiographs during subsequent follow-ups after L3-5 TLIF
The series of radiographs…
Figure 2. Series of radiographs during subsequent follow-ups after L3-5 TLIF
The series of radiographs demonstrate the different time points of follow-up after L3-5 TLIF (A: immediate postoperative; B: two months postoperative; C: three months postoperative; and D: six months postoperative). The patient experienced a fall two months after TLIF. The radiograph arranged immediately after the episode (B) revealed no significant change, compared with the postoperative status. Elongated anterior-posterior length over L5 body with progressive listhesis was observed at postoperative three- and six-month follow-ups (C and D respectively). After the secondary surgery, L5 total laminectomy and extended fixation from L3 to S2 were performed to restore lumbosacral alignment (E) TLIF: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Figure 3. L5 fracture on CT scans
Figure 3. L5 fracture on CT scans
Illustration of CT scans at six months after…
Figure 3. L5 fracture on CT scans
Illustration of CT scans at six months after the first surgery and three months after the secondary surgery. After the patient had an accident by falling on the ground, a transverse fracture line across the right transverse to the L5 body with mild callus formation (A, dashed line), and a vertical fracture line over the posterior third of the L5 body with endplate destruction (B, arrowhead) were observed. The secondary surgery with L5 total laminectomy and extended fixation from L3 to S2 was performed. At the three-month postoperative follow-up, the CT scan revealed good bone healing over the transverse (C) and vertical fracture lines (D) after the secondary surgery CT: computed tomography
Similar articles
-
Sagittal reconstruction of lumbosacral contiguous double-level spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: a comparison of double-level and single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Du CZ, Li S, Xu L, Zhou QS, Zhu ZZ, Sun X, Qiu Y.
Du CZ, et al.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 May 23;14(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1197-7.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019.PMID: 31122245
Free PMC article. -
Circumferential fusion: a comparative analysis between anterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis.
Tye EY, Tanenbaum JE, Alonso AS, Xiao R, Steinmetz MP, Mroz TE, Savage JW.
Tye EY, et al.
Spine J. 2018 Mar;18(3):464-471. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.227. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
Spine J. 2018.PMID: 28821444
-
Transsacral interbody fixation versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction for long fusions in primary adult scoliosis.
Yi HL, Faloon M, Changoor S, Ross T, Boachie-Adjei O.
Yi HL, et al.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2020 Feb 14:1-8. doi: 10.3171/2019.12.SPINE19397. Online ahead of print.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2020.PMID: 32059186
-
Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.
Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ.
Mobbs RJ, et al.
J Spine Surg. 2015 Dec;1(1):2-18. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05.
J Spine Surg. 2015.PMID: 27683674
Free PMC article.Review.
-
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
de Kunder SL, van Kuijk SMJ, Rijkers K, Caelers IJMH, van Hemert WLW, de Bie RA, van Santbrink H.
de Kunder SL, et al.
Spine J. 2017 Nov;17(11):1712-1721. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
Spine J. 2017.PMID: 28647584
Review.
References
-
-
Dynamic stabilization for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up. Kuo CH, Chang PY, Wu JC, et al. Neurosurg Focus. 2016;40:0.
–
PubMed
-
-
-
Radiological adjacent-segment degeneration in L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison between dynamic stabilization and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Kuo CH, Huang WC, Wu JC, Tu TH, Fay LY, Wu CL, Cheng H. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;29:250–258.
–
PubMed
-
-
-
Perioperative complications in patients undergoing open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as a revision surgery. Khan IS, Sonig A, Thakur JD, Bollam P, Nanda A. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;18:260–264.
–
PubMed
-
-
-
Perioperative surgical complications of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center experience. Tormenti MJ, Maserati MB, Bonfield CM, et al. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16:44–50.
–
PubMed
-
-
-
Complications in TLIF spondylodesis-do they influence the outcome for patients? A prospective two-center study. Poppenborg P, Liljenqvist U, Gosheger G, et al. Eur Spine J. 2021;30:1320–1328.
–
PubMed
-
Cite