. 2021 Aug 18;13(8):e17275.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.17275.
eCollection 2021 Aug.
Affiliations
Affiliation
- 1 Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, IND.
Item in Clipboard
Bikram Kar et al.
Cureus.
.
Display options
Format
. 2021 Aug 18;13(8):e17275.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.17275.
eCollection 2021 Aug.
Affiliation
- 1 Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, IND.
Item in Clipboard
Display options
Format
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate whether surgical site vancomycin mixed in bone grafts and local vancomycin mixed in normal saline wash before wound closure decrease the infection rates in patients undergoing lumbar spinal instrumentation and posterolateral fusion. A retrospective study was performed on cases between 2017 and 2019, who underwent lumbar spine instrumentation and posterolateral fusion for lumbar canal stenosis or listhesis. The routine prophylactic procedures were performed in all patients as per institutional protocol. Patients’ records were analysed and categorised into two groups, the vancomycin group (VG), where vancomycin mixed in bone graft and normal saline wash was used at the surgical site, and the control group (CG), where vancomycin was not used. The study included 63 patients, 31 in VG and 32 in CG. There is no statistical difference in age, sex, and diabetes mellitus in both groups. A total of seven cases were infected, six in CG (6/32) and one in VG (1/31). Out of six infections in CG, three patients had diabetes and four infected cases underwent surgery for debridement. In VG, the only single case got infected and treated with intravenous antibiotics. We found that the use of vancomycin added to the bone graft and normal saline in posterior lumbar spinal instrumentation and posterolateral fusion is associated with significantly lower rates of infection (p value=0.049).
Keywords:
intraoperative vancomycin saline wash; lumbar spine fusion; postoperative infection; spinal surgery infection prophylaxis; surgical site vancomycin prophylaxis.
Copyright © 2021, Kar et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
-
Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. de Lissovoy G, Fraeman K, Hutchins V, Murphy D, Song D, Vaughn BB. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2008.12.010. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37:387–397.
–
PubMed
-
-
-
Prophylactic intraoperative powdered vancomycin and postoperative deep spinal wound infection: 1,512 consecutive surgical cases over a 6-year period. Molinari RW, Khera OA, Molinari WJ 3rd. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2104-z. Eur Spine J. 2012;21 Suppl 4:0–82.
–
PMC
–
PubMed
-
-
-
Rates of infection after spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Sansur CA, et al. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181eadd41. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:556–563.
–
PubMed
-
-
-
Incidence, prevalence, and analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection following adult spinal surgery. Pull ter Gunne AF, Cohen DB. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a03013. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:1422–1428.
–
PubMed
-
-
-
Postoperative spinal wound infection: a review of 2,391 consecutive index procedures. Weinstein MA, McCabe JP, Cammisa FP Jr. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-200010000-00009. J Spinal Disord. 2000;13:422–426.
–
PubMed
-
Cite