Application of a modified optical fiber in targeted percutaneous laser disc decompression of lumbar disc herniation: A retrospective study

. 2019 Nov;18(5):3552-3562.


doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7983.


Epub 2019 Sep 6.

Affiliations

Free PMC article

Item in Clipboard

Chao Meng et al.


Exp Ther Med.


.

Free PMC article

Abstract

Targeted percutaneous laser disc decompression (T-PLDD) is a minimally invasive technique for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, the amount of energy required is large and the nerve can be easily damaged. Therefore, this technology requires improvement. The present study aimed to observe the effects of using a modified optical fiber (Mod) in T-PLDD for the treatment of LDH. A retrospective study was conducted using the database of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (Qingdao, China). In total, 58 patients who received T-PLDD with the Mod between June 2011 and May 2012 were included in the present study. The 10-point numeric rating score, pain rating index and good-to-excellent rating at 3 months (1.64±0.97; 5.79±1.57; 94.8%) were lower than those at 1 week (5.12±1.37; 11.52±1.85; 74.2%), and at 1 month (3.26±1.41; 7.83±1.31; 82.8%; P<0.05) and were maintained for up to 36 months (1.48±0.86; 4.91±1.43; 96.5%). The Oswestry disability index and 12-item Short Form Health Survey at 6 months (24.56±6.78; 69.40±5.08) were improved compared with 1 week, 1 month and 3 months, and were maintained for 36 months (23.10±6.20; 70.89±5.39). The T2 value decreased at 1 week (76±8) and returned to normal at 3 months (152±11). Additionally, patients in the Young group (<50 years old) recovered in a shorter period of time than the patients in the Elderly group. In conclusion, the patients stayed in hospital for 3.34±0.66 days; pain decreased and function increased optimally at 3-6 months and was maintained for 36 months with no serious complications. Individuals <50 years old may be more suitable candidates for T-PLDD with the Mod. The Mod should be applied and promoted in T-PLDD, and its use should be considered in the clinical setting.


Keywords:

lumbar disc herniation; modified optical fiber; targeted percutaneous laser disc decompression.

Figures


Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Con and Mod. (A) Macroscopic observations of (A) Con and (B) Mod. (C) Microscopic observation of (C) Con and (D) Mod (magnification, ×200). The tip of the Con was smooth, whereas the tip of the Mod was rough and punched irregularly. Con, conventional optical fiber; Mod, modified optical fiber.


Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Con and Mod. (A) Macroscopic observations of (A) Con and (B) Mod. (C) Microscopic observation of (C) Con and (D) Mod (magnification, ×200). The tip of the Con was smooth, whereas the tip of the Mod was rough and punched irregularly. Con, conventional optical fiber; Mod, modified optical fiber.


Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Con and Mod. (A) Macroscopic observations of (A) Con and (B) Mod. (C) Microscopic observation of (C) Con and (D) Mod (magnification, ×200). The tip of the Con was smooth, whereas the tip of the Mod was rough and punched irregularly. Con, conventional optical fiber; Mod, modified optical fiber.


Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Con and Mod. (A) Macroscopic observations of (A) Con and (B) Mod. (C) Microscopic observation of (C) Con and (D) Mod (magnification, ×200). The tip of the Con was smooth, whereas the tip of the Mod was rough and punched irregularly. Con, conventional optical fiber; Mod, modified optical fiber.


Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Length and width of the vaporization cavity in pig spinal motor units. (A) Vaporization cavity with (A) 200 J of a Con, (B) 400 J of a Con, (C) 600 J of a Con, (D) 200 J of a Mod, (E) 400 J of a Mod and (F) 600 J of a Mod. (G) Length and width of the vaporization cavity in different groups (n=10). *P


Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Length and width of the vaporization cavity in pig spinal motor units. (A) Vaporization cavity with (A) 200 J of a Con, (B) 400 J of a Con, (C) 600 J of a Con, (D) 200 J of a Mod, (E) 400 J of a Mod and (F) 600 J of a Mod. (G) Length and width of the vaporization cavity in different groups (n=10). *P


Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Length and width of the vaporization cavity in pig spinal motor units. (A) Vaporization cavity with (A) 200 J of a Con, (B) 400 J of a Con, (C) 600 J of a Con, (D) 200 J of a Mod, (E) 400 J of a Mod and (F) 600 J of a Mod. (G) Length and width of the vaporization cavity in different groups (n=10). *P


Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Length and width of the vaporization cavity in pig spinal motor units. (A) Vaporization cavity with (A) 200 J of a Con, (B) 400 J of a Con, (C) 600 J of a Con, (D) 200 J of a Mod, (E) 400 J of a Mod and (F) 600 J of a Mod. (G) Length and width of the vaporization cavity in different groups (n=10). *P


Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Length and width of the vaporization cavity in pig spinal motor units. (A) Vaporization cavity with (A) 200 J of a Con, (B) 400 J of a Con, (C) 600 J of a Con, (D) 200 J of a Mod, (E) 400 J of a Mod and (F) 600 J of a Mod. (G) Length and width of the vaporization cavity in different groups (n=10). *P


Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Length and width of the vaporization cavity in pig spinal motor units. (A) Vaporization cavity with (A) 200 J of a Con, (B) 400 J of a Con, (C) 600 J of a Con, (D) 200 J of a Mod, (E) 400 J of a Mod and (F) 600 J of a Mod. (G) Length and width of the vaporization cavity in different groups (n=10). *P


Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Length and width of the vaporization cavity in pig spinal motor units. (A) Vaporization cavity with (A) 200 J of a Con, (B) 400 J of a Con, (C) 600 J of a Con, (D) 200 J of a Mod, (E) 400 J of a Mod and (F) 600 J of a Mod. (G) Length and width of the vaporization cavity in different groups (n=10). *P


Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Position of the needle tip in targeted percutaneous laser disc decompression under X-ray guidance. (A) Needle tip located at one-fifth of the distance into the intervertebral space in the lateral position. (B) Needle tip located at the lateral border of the vertebral body in the anteroposterior position.


Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Position of the needle tip in targeted percutaneous laser disc decompression under X-ray guidance. (A) Needle tip located at one-fifth of the distance into the intervertebral space in the lateral position. (B) Needle tip located at the lateral border of the vertebral body in the anteroposterior position.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ramakrishnan A, Webb KM, Cowperthwaite MC. One-year outcomes of early-crossover patients in a cohort receiving nonoperative care for lumbar disc herniation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;7:391–396. doi: 10.3171/2017.2.SPINE16760.



      DOI



      PubMed

    1. Ren C, Li Y, Qin R, Sun P, Wang P. Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation causing bilateral symptoms. World Neurosurg. 2017;106:413–421. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.191.



      DOI



      PubMed

    1. Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet. 1999;354:581–585. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01312-4.



      DOI



      PubMed

    1. Zhao XL, Fu ZJ, Xu YG, Zhao XJ, Song WG, Zheng H. Treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation using C-arm fluoroscopy guided target percutaneous laser disc decompression. Photomed Laser Surg. 2012;30:92–95. doi: 10.1089/pho.2011.3050.



      DOI



      PMC



      PubMed

    1. van den Akker-van Marle ME, Brouwer PA, Brand R, Koes B, van den Hout WB, van Buchem MA, Peul WC. Percutaneous laser disc decompression versus microdiscectomy for sciatica: Cost utility analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial. Interv Neuroradiol. 2017;23:538–545. doi: 10.1177/1591019917710297.



      DOI



      PMC



      PubMed

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on vk
VK
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Close Menu